Bahadur Shah Nama by Muqrib Khan

 Bahadur Shah Nama

Bahadur Shah Nama by Muqrib Khan

(From Muqrib Khan)

Historical significance of Muqrib Khan's "Bahadur Shah Nama"

Muqrib Khan

Muqrib Khan's real name was Mirza Nooruddin. According to one tradition he was born in India while according to another tradition he came to India during the reign of Shah Jahan. Some historians state that he belonged to the Ulema family of Mashhad. "Safina Khoshgoo" states that they passed through Mashhad and They came to India under Aurangzeb. And here he took the job of Aurangzeb. According to tradition, he continued to work as the custodian of Noor-ud-Din in the Alamgiri era and later as the "Khansaman ''. He also served as the custodian of the Jewelry House. Some historians have written that after the death of Aurangzeb, Muqrib Khan handed over all the diamonds and jewels to Bahadur Shah. Similarly, the title of "Muqrib Khan'' was given to him by Alamgir. The year of death of Muqrib Khan is said to be 1710. His burial is in Delhi.

Authors

The names of the following works of Muqrib Khan are found in books:

1. beauty and love

2. Beauty and Heart
3. Comfort of hearts
4. war letters
5. events in Hyderabad
6. Bahadur Shah Nama

Bahadur Shah Nama

Bahadur Shahnameh (also known as "Shah Alam" in history) is a detailed political, cultural and administrative history of the reign of the Mughal emperor Bahadur Shah.

Features

1. The author of "Bahadur Shah Namah" was a contemporary of Bahadur Shah and had access to his court. In that sense, the book is a contemporary history. The author is an eyewitness to most situations and events. This book can be used as a document to compile the history of the reign of Bahadur Shah.

2. The author, while acting impartially, describes the king's strengths as well as his weaknesses and weaknesses. In particular, the king's reforms were targeted.

3. The author has also commented on many occasions and given advice to Bahadur Shah. This advice to the king is available to other official historians, and no one has dared to do so.

4. This book is an authentic history of the late Mughal rulers. It also lists some events that are not found in other history books.

5. In this book the circumstances and events of the reign of Bahadur Shah are described in more detail than in other books. The details of the incident were not ignored.

6. The author has also relied on authentic documents to compile his history. In this regard, he has made official records of the books of important historians and important

What is the use of officials?

7. The author has thoroughly examined every aspect of the reign of Bahadur Shah and has uncovered various aspects of the king's personal life. The author also sympathizes with him. He has also felt pity for his frail age, and in a few words his weaknesses have also been described.

8. What some historians have shown is the weakness and cowardice of the kings. Muqrib Khan has tried to prove his greatness by taking them into account of the king's "strategy". Some historians such as Khafi Khan have shown the king. To the king.He has tried to prove "Shah Bekhabar" but Muqrib Khan has defended the king in this regard. Historians have objected that Bahadur Shah gave the same title to many

personalities, it was not his wisdom. It was a reaction of the king against the princes.

9. A study of this book also reveals the palace conspiracies of the brave royal era. The author has drawn a map of the courtyard from the interior and has separated the king's friends and enemies. This style is not found in any other history.

10. Bahadur Shah Namah is an excellent example of Fari broadcast in terms of language, expression and style of writing. There are elements of simplicity, ease and fluency in it. As the author was also a high profile poet, he has tried his best to create beauty and charm in his book through poems and verses. Some prose phrases create a jingle of metaphors. It combines emotion painting and imagery into realism.

The short story is that Muqrib Khan has created a new dimension in historiography which is not present in his contemporary historians. He has seen the king through the eyes of a man. And human beings have tried to prove it. He did not try to prove the king to be a supernatural being, an angel or a divine being.